Artwork > Finished Works and Works in Progress
The Thinker crystalized
Lord of Twisties:
Totally forgot about the ground recieving. I had everything else. It worked.
And $imon, if you paid attention to old posts, you would know that the faces are not extruded at all. They are subdivided by a value of 50. Second, whoever said everything had to be anatomically correct? If you paid attention even farther back, you'd know that this is a simple model to practice with, mainly sequences. I didn't see a quality limit on what could be posted here. When you were a noob, you would be just as happy about it. Just look through the gallery! Nothing has to be real! Animation can be for personal fun too. It doesn't have to be exciting to you.
So thanks for the tip, anyway.
flametiger74:
What is that soposed to be anayway.
Mr.Smeagol:
--- Quote from: flametiger74 on December 22, 2007, 06:43:59 pm ---What is that supposed to be anyway.
--- End quote ---
Abstract human-like figure in an interesting pose with cool material :) ? y... at least that's my opinion.
I think maybe top of the head and shoulder and bottom of the leg could have been done different then it would look more consistent i guess... well i guess that's how I would do it but I cant really criticize an abstract figure in that way can I? :D
Lord of Twisties:
I guess it would be called abstract. Makes sense. I was just having fun and learning shadows and such. Technically, it's now even in the "Thinker" pose. Oh well.
I then rendered it antialiased, and it took two hours. But it was worth it.
mcheccyb:
let me guess, subdivide with a setting of 2
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version