Anim8or Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

An update to Anim8or, v1.00b, is available with a few bug fixes. Get your copy HERE. See the "ReadMe" file for details.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
 1 
 on: July 20, 2018, 07:40:40 pm 
Started by Steve - Last post by AlecJames
Trevor - what does it mean "has corona as close to Z-Near as possible"?

 2 
 on: July 20, 2018, 05:41:18 pm 
Started by Steve - Last post by Trevor
oh, haha, I know we can do it manually, I was meaning more a An8 feature for Steve :P, it would certainly make ART unique.

haha, I couldn't resist testing my old lightsaber in the new ART

10:33 for full self illumination (DIR) with 64AA - there are no "Lights" in the scene

Final image has corona as close to Z-Near as possible.

Trev

 3 
 on: July 20, 2018, 07:35:48 am 
Started by Steve - Last post by ENSONIQ5
Trevor: Definitely possible, I'm planning an animation test with multi-threading and will include coronas :)

 4 
 on: July 19, 2018, 05:18:15 pm 
Started by Steve - Last post by Trevor
Those Christmas lights just scream "Corona required" :P

hmm, actually, just having a think about it, how hard would it be to have 2d sprites attached to the Z-Near and locked to the on-screen position of "target" nodes?

Bit more of a "Game Engine" feature than a "3D Modeler" feature, but it would be great for renderings (scanline or ART)

Trev

 5 
 on: July 19, 2018, 12:49:09 pm 
Started by Steve - Last post by ENSONIQ5
Agreed, they compare very well indeed and the speed is really impressive.  If anything I think the Anim8or 1329 render has the edge, there is a richer saturation and it's a more pleasing render overall.

 6 
 on: July 18, 2018, 06:23:53 pm 
Started by Steve - Last post by Steve
ENSONIQ5: Nice comparisons. I'm really pleased at how well the latest Anim8or compares to Carrara. Carrara's lighting and glass effects are noticeably better, but overall Anim8or's speed and soft shadows seem to match Carrara's.

 7 
 on: July 18, 2018, 01:41:49 pm 
Started by Steve - Last post by ENSONIQ5
I've done some more testing and run some render time comparisons between Anim8or V1.0, Anim8or build 1329 with multi-threading, and Carrara.  It's tricky to run a fair comparison with Carrara since it is an entirely different package with a different set of parameters but I have attempted to match the AA, materials and lighting as close as possible on a quick still life with lots of lights (14), ART attributes and soft shadows.  Materials and lights in Carrara have been set to match Anim8or as closely as possible, and the model is identical.  Renders are attached and times are below:

Anim8or V1.0 AA100: 50m 11s
Anim8or V1.0 AA100 (fast AA): 11m 10s
Anim8or build 1329 AA100 multi-threading on: 5m 47s
Carrara: 9m 5s

There are some minor issues with the 1329 multi-thread render (some previously noted):

  • Graininess in the lower-right of the glass ball
  • Apparent lack of AA on objects visible behind the glass ball - some jaggy edges (may be the same issue as above)
  • Slight step in shadow at near corner of wooden ramp, though it is actually more pronounced on both V1.0 renders

Aside from this, the handling of shadows in general and the quality of the lighting is significantly better in 1329 than V1.0 and, remarkably, rendered quicker than Carrara.  This isn't a 'Carrara vs Anim8or' thread by any means as both have their advantages (Carrara for its massively powerful materials engine, Anim8or for it's workflow and simple UV editor), this comparison is only about rendering times.

 8 
 on: July 17, 2018, 07:48:22 am 
Started by Steve - Last post by ENSONIQ5
This is a game changer!  Rendering speeds are fantastic, attached took about 2 minutes with AA at 100 on i7 quad core (8 threads), image size 1920x1080.  No problems to report at this stage, testing animation at the moment.

 9 
 on: July 16, 2018, 06:04:47 pm 
Started by Steve - Last post by Steve
Trevor: You are correct. Your CPU has 8 multi threaded cores for 16 threads. Anim8or currently limits the max thread count to 8 but I'll increase that to 16 in the next build.

(P.S. Can I exchange CPUs with you :) ?)

 10 
 on: July 16, 2018, 05:39:25 pm 
Started by Steve - Last post by Trevor
I have 2 physical cores and 4 logical cores = 4 threads. I suspect that you have 4 physical cores and 8 logical cores - that's what Intel calls a "8 core cpu".

Erm... no... I have 8 cores, 16 threads, Im not mistaken :P

Hmm, looking at the cores, it would seem that they are all doing something since right before pressing render they were all more-or-less idle, however only 8 red lines ever show up on the preview.

maybe Im missing something?

Ok, so doing some tests with affinity and priority it seems you made a comment earlier that less cores could be faster, it seems your right, limiting to the first thread of each core actually works out faster than allowing all threads to run.


Trev

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10